Skip to main content

Week 3: усилия (effort)

A few of you have commented about how I have the intrinsic motivation to learn Russian. At the risk of making myself sound less awesome, that’s only partly true. I do want to learn Russian, but I had more intrinsic motivation to learn it when I was over there for three weeks than I do now. (If my wife didn’t speak perfect English then that’d probably be different.)

There are a couple reasons why I don’t have a ton of intrinsic motivation to learn Russian. One is what I already said about not living there and also not having it as a necessary part of any communication that I do. The other reason is that it’s hard. This is a totally new language with a new alphabet, which doesn’t at all build on my understanding of a Latin-based language like Spanish. At this early stage, the challenge level is still beyond my grasp, especially knowing how long it can take to learn a language. I’m not exactly sure what learning theory to incorporate here to explain the gap between challenge and ability, but I’m pretty sure it’s the opposite of “flow.”

This is trying to teach me different ways of saying "have." I have, you have, they have, etc. It's hard to track a consistent pattern to remember these words and how to use them.

So instead of relying on intrinsic motivation to push me along, I am relying on effort, thanks to last week’s Dweck article that got me thinking more about this. Up until this week I was typically studying Russian for about a half hour three days a week, but this week I’ve been taking time to study every day, usually just doing one lesson a day, which is at least 20 minutes, and also means that I’m applying “distributed practice.”

This one is teaching me the plural and gender forms of adjectives, in this case the word "green." Green apple, green bike, green car, green pens. Except in Russian. 


In the Martinez book he references Dweck when talking about “incremental theory,” which is when you see your intellectual abilities as the result of experience and effort. It’s nice to know that you can increase your capacity to learn something, but this also says to me that most things won’t come easy. In addition to the daily, more consistent effort, I’ve also been doing every lesson at least twice so that I can better work this stuff into my long-term memory. On page 57 Martinez talks about “write time parameter.” This says that it takes about a minute for information to get stored into your long-term memory. There are already several words that are sinking into my long-term memory that I am able to recall. And occasionally I’ll say a Russian word that comes to mind without remembering what it means. But at least it’s there.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 4: Предварительные Знания (Prior Knowledge)

There are a few things I went over this week. The first is writing. I don’t have to include the writing portion in my Rosetta Stone lessons, but I choose to just to help with further review and familiarity with words. The writing lessons are probably also the funnest part, and not terribly hard either, mainly because the keyboard is mostly phonetic, and RS also has the keyboard right on the screen. I was also finally introduced to numbers. Counting is always the first sign of knowing a language. Один (1), два (2), три (3), and so on. But one, two, and three is really all you need to know when it comes to picture taking. I remember learning these numbers when I was in Russia taking pictures, and so was able to recall them this time around. Here it is asking me to say the number. I think I nailed it. And speaking of recall and having things more solidified in my long-term memory, I came across some words in a new lesson that I was already familiar with because they...

Week 8: До свидания! (Goodbye!)

I started a new unit this week and it solidified two things that I’ve already remarked on before, the importance of context and the little ways my wife helps me, which boosts my ZPD. As I’ve said before, Rosetta doesn’t give the English translation, and so you have to figure out what is being said based on the image and the context Rosetta tries to create. The phrases in this picture below were kind of difficult to figure out and were really only clear after I asked my wife what they meant. In a real life context, it may be easier since I would be able to see the entire process play out, and know what came before and what came after, instead of just getting five separate images. 1. "The man and his car." 2. "His car is red." 3. "He's driving his car." 4. (This is implying that he's about to let the other guy drive his car.) 5. "He's driving his (as in the other guy's) car." All this was pretty hard to figure out on my own...